![]() Nonetheless, says Steve Newcomb, the founder of web interface company Famous, Facebook could make life difficult for ad blocking companies. But he did leave a comment on Hacker News, a popular online hangout for programmers, indicating that he’s already looking at some of the possible ways that Facebook might try bypass ad blockers. We were unable to reach Raymond Hill, the developer of uBlock Origin. “Circumvention tactics have been around for 10 years, and because ad blockers have the support of an open source community, the workarounds they develop just have to be that much better than the previous circumvention.” Indeed, the popular ad blocker uBlock Origin is already capable of filtering sponsored advertising from many websites. Facebook’s plan is “a little adrift of reality,” says Ben Williams, of Eyeo GmbH, the company behind the popular Ad Block Plus plugin. But the company does plan to make it clear to users which content is paid advertising, and that could provide the clues ad blockers need to spot the ads.Ĭertainly, the makers of ad blockers are skeptical. There’s a fair amount that Facebook can do to make it harder for machines to tell which blocks of code on its website refer to ads and which refer to conventional content. The idea is that ad-blockers won’t be able to tell the difference between ads and everything else on the page, and therefore won’t block the ads.Īt the moment, it’s unclear how well this will work. Instead, a Facebook spokesperson tells us, the company is changing the way it renders ads on the desktop version of its website. Facebook’s approach differs from other attempts to stop ad blocking, such as the one from WIRED, which attempts to prevent people from viewing a page if they have an ad blocker installed. But its new move on the web could be a bellwether for the rest of industry. ![]() ![]() Its mobile app-which brings in about 84 percent of its income, according to its most recent earnings report-is largely immune to ad blockers. Like you I do see some initial queries are a bit slow, but not bad.Facebook is hardly hurting for revenue. I had used unbound in the past at various workplaces, so I installed it and set it up to do DoT and removed cloudflared. I found that the cloudflared daemon just wasn't very reliable, no matter what version I used. I wanted to add an update to my original post about exactly this. also Unbound refreshes cache on its own for the repeating queries to reduce the lookup time (ie the longer it runs the more it "learns" how to pre-populate the cache). My new lookups are 0.2 seconds, which is a bit slow imo, but not too bad. this works better than cloudflared daemon. But I've configured 'unbound' DNS resolver on pi zero w with forwarders to cloudflare and quad9 over DoT (dns over TLS). There are still some unofficial cloudflared builds for pi. I ran into some problems with that older version, and I had a 3 b+ sitting around, so I just switched to that and am now using the current version of cloudflared. Cloudflare has dropped support for old Raspberry Pis, so the Zero W was only able to run an older version of cloudflared. I wanted to do DNS over HTTPS, and I used the cloudflare proxy for this. I have actually switched to using a Raspberry Pi 3 b+ for Pi-hole. home NAS) and add simple script oo mikrotik to refresh dns blacklist list Now - just put the converter to cron (on pc or eg. ![]() :if (] > 0) do=" mostly based on someone else's idea (. tool fetch check-certificate=no mode=https url=$hostScriptUrl dst-path=("./".$scriptName) # Setup this Policy for script: Read Write Policy Test # For changing any parameters, please, use this link: # StopAD - Script for blocking advertisements, based on your defined hosts files Code: Select all IP - DHCP - Networks - added IP of my mikrotik to DNSĪdd action=redirect chain=dstnat dst-port=53 in-interface=bridge protocol=udpĬhecked all sites in, wrote 127.0.0.1, added script to my mikrotik ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |